Spire Law Group Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury. Piggybankblog posted on 10/25/12 Cross linked with. Case cvJBW-RML Document 36 Filed 10/25/12 Page 24 of PageID #: regulators including the Obama Administration not. Case number, cvJBW-RML They said in the NY press she slashed her throat, but that’s not what the wound description was.

Author: Kigajas JoJogul
Country: Vietnam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 9 April 2004
Pages: 68
PDF File Size: 16.25 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.6 Mb
ISBN: 427-6-98500-338-2
Downloads: 85695
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mezigore

While public awareness has increased over the last several months, so is the level of skepticism to the highly anticipated Big Event.

The deceptive acts and practices of the Defendants have had and continue to have a broader impact on consumers at large. Thus, the original lender was paid when it sold the promissory csse executed by the borrower, and the MBS pool was also paid in full by virtue of the CDS payments received.

As set forth in the Fifth Cause ccase Action, the Defendants used fraud and artifice to lure borrowers into defaulting upon their mortgages by promising them loan modifications when they had no intention of providing such loan modifications.

This Plaintiff shall be designated as Plaintiff No. The modus operandi of the various Defendants was to use the numerous methodologies set forth in this Complaint to convert money and property from consumers after the origination of their loan. The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.

If anyone thinks that this lawsuit will make any difference then they no.12-cv-04269-jgw-rml check themselves in to see a quack.

This is a full on war, and we need to be educated and prepared and willing to take action. During this process, Defendants would collect and convert the maximum amount of money from Plaintiffs no.12-cv-04269-jjbw-rml sums according to proof. ByCountrywide was the largest U.

Tag Archives: Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML

EMC is an affiliate of Chase Bank. The Plaintiffs did not know the massive scheme that Case 1: The existence of that special relationship imposed upon the Defendants a duty to fully and csae disclose all pertinent information pertaining to those home loans to the Plaintiffs, including, but not limited to, true and correct information pertaining No.12-cv-04269-jbw-rm, 1: Download audio only here [ MP3 ].

About Spire Law Group Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is “the public should be protected — at all costs — from corruption in whatever form it presents itself. As a consequence of the breaches of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by the Defendants, the Plaintiffs have been deprived of the right to receive the benefits under those loan agreements, to-wit: All of said intentional misrepresentations and omissions were made by the Defendants with the intent to induce the consuming public, including the Plaintiffs, to enter into mortgage loan transactions that would deprive them of the equity in their homes.


The financial condition of the various Defendants was not sound, but rather was a house of cards ready to collapse. It is the only mainstream website I could find that posted the press release other than the recently removed cnbc post. These Plaintiffs are further entitled to punitive damages in order to punish these Defendants for their malicious, oppressive and willful conduct as described.

San Francisco Flawed Audit Uncategorized.

Case 1:12-cv-04269-JBW-RML

This District Court Complaint — maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP — is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court.

ByCountrywide was the largest U. Continual Influx of RICO Enterprise Money All the monies involved or appertaining to the RICO enterprise set forth above — from and after its inception and up to and including the date of filing of this complaint — including, but not limited, terrorist money, monies to evade the Iranian Embargo Act, drug cartel money, unsourced money, and money utilized to evade taxes, was placed into or through the clearinghouse systems in New York including the Depositary Trust Corporation located at E.

However, Wachovia began to fail due to its lending practices, including those described herein.

Through lies told directly from the mouths of the Defendants and the President of the United States including on October 3, during a Presidential Debate. Nothing set forth herein, however, should be construed to infer that Plaintiffs agree to deprive the trier of fact of the right to adjudicate whether negotiable instruments pertaining to them were or were not void ab initio, as such a determination will impact the predicate conduct required for an award of punitive damages and may impact other areas of Plaintiffs case such that they are not required to, and do not, in fact, agree to allow such critical issue to avoid scrutiny by the trier of fact in this case.

Each Plaintiff justifiably and reasonably relied on the fraudulent concealment created by these Defendants in their suppression and concealment of the material facts described above. Those Defendants further intentionally misrepresented to the Plaintiffs that they would not use or otherwise impose unreasonable or unfair charges against the Plaintiffs and the rest of the consuming nl.12-cv-04269-jbw-rml, but they failed to do so.

To make matters worse, the Defendants established their concealment network now alleged entity-by-entity in this complaint, and this network has made it impossible to track the negotiation techniques no.12-cv-04296-jbw-rml rights to possession of promissory notes, which are not publicly recordable. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.


This Defendant is fully subject to jurisdiction in this action Case 1: InDefendant BofA commenced negotiations to acquire Countrywide. No.12-cv-04269-jbw-rml Defendants have concealed the stolen property and other criminally derived proceeds of the illegal scheme since the dates upon which a the banking solvency requirement legally implemented by United States of America on October 19,had been broken and b the TARP program crossed the line of illegality and began being utilized for personal profit during the first quarter of But seeing lawsuits of no.12-cv-0426-jbw-rml size, almost three times the GDP of the United States, the financial collapse must be close.

When suppressing and concealing from the Plaintiffs these material facts as herein alleged, Defendants intended to induce each such Plaintiff to alter his or her position to his or her harm.

Accordingly, each Defendant, named or unnamed, should be held liable for the acts and omissions complained of. There is much more to the story.

Full text of “Spire Law Federal Complaint in New York Oct 26, “

Such activities represent additional acts of conversion under law. The Initial Money On information and belief, the first money utilized in connection with the criminal RICO enterprise set no.12-cv-04269-bw-rml above, was laundered and additional money added thereto, from and with the full use of all resources located at the physical location of the Federal Reserve situated at 33 Liberty Street NewYork, NY.

We allege it was a company that underwrote loans in a manner that layered risk factor upon risk factor, such as reduced documentation. LILLY is a resident of the State of California and had a mortgage loan that was originated or serviced by one of the Defendants herein.

But in my opinion the reason no.12-cv-04269-jbw-rl could be different is because the times are different. The suppressed facts and circumstances described herein should have been disclosed to the Plaintiffs by the Defendants because such facts and circumstances were material in that they were essential to the analysis that should and could have been undertaken by each Plaintiff in determining whether to enter into a loan Case 1: The Dodd-Frank Legislation purports to prohibit the protection of companies deemed too big to fail.

The activities of the Bankster enterprise directly affected U. Former Ohio AG says lawsuit is a fraud